<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Developing For .NET &#187; Graphics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.developingfor.net/category/graphics/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.developingfor.net</link>
	<description>Real World .NET Methods, Tricks, and Examples</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:25:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Computer Graphics &#8211; Assignment 1</title>
		<link>http://www.developingfor.net/graphics/computer-graphics-assignment-1.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.developingfor.net/graphics/computer-graphics-assignment-1.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Graphics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.developingfor.net/?p=240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve long thought that Computer Graphics has been the missing piece in my Web design toolbox. It always seemed that the best designs had good graphics: even sites with very few or subtle graphics have a certain quality to them that I was never able to really replicate just using CSS and my hacked together [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.developingfor.net/graphics/computer-graphics-assignment-1.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
